Observational studyJournal of dental research2024
Publicly Available Dental Image Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.
Observational study in Journal of dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- DentSeg3: A Three-Branch Specialized Fusion Network for Dental Lesion Segmentation in Color Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced dental caries detection using ConvNeXt-FPN with Faster R-CNN framework on panoramic and intraoral images.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- CODE (comprehensive oral mucosa database with explanations): a smartphone-based normative intraoral image dataset for oral mucosal feature learning and ai applications.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Automated Adaptive Approach for Specular Highlight Removal in Digital Dentistry: A Proof-of-Concept Study for Preserving Tooth Surface Texture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Dental image analysis and surgical decision support using modified generative adversarial networks.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Evaluation of Dental Composite Restorations: A Scoping Review.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: collaborative asset or looming replacement?Oral radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Concise Review of Reporting Checklists and Guidelines.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in oral health management: challenges and opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Support in Dentistry Through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multi-Regional deep learning models for identifying dental restorations and prosthesis in panoramic radiographs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characteristics, licensing, and ethical considerations of openly accessible oral-maxillofacial imaging datasets: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Decoding wisdom: Evaluating ChatGPT's accuracy and reproducibility in analyzing orthopantomographic images for third molar assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Advanced Imaging in Dental Research: From Gene Mapping to AI Global Data.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in dentistry requires large and well-annotated datasets. However, the availability of public dental imaging datasets remains unclear. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of all publicly available dental imaging datasets to address this gap and support AI development. This observational study searched all publicly available dataset resources (academic databases, preprints, and AI challenges), focusing on datasets/articles from 2020 to 2023, with PubMed searches extending back to 2011. We comprehensively searched for dental AI datasets containing images (intraoral photos, scans, radiographs, etc.) using relevant keywords. We included datasets of >50 images obtained from publicly available sources. We extracted dataset characteristics, patient demographics, country of origin, dataset size, ethical clearance, image details, FAIRness metrics, and metadata completeness. We screened 131,028 records and extracted 16 unique dental imaging datasets. The datasets were obtained from Kaggle (18.8%), GitHub, Google, Mendeley, PubMed, Zenodo (each 12.5%), Grand-Challenge, OSF, and arXiv (each 6.25%). The primary focus was tooth segmentation (62.5%) and labeling (56.2%). Panoramic radiography was the most common imaging modality (58.8%). Of the 13 countries, China contributed the most images (2,413). Of the datasets, 75% contained annotations, whereas the methods used to establish labels were often unclear and inconsistent. Only 31.2% of the datasets reported ethical approval, and 56.25% did not specify a license. Most data were obtained from dental clinics (50%). Intraoral radiographs had the highest findability score in the FAIR assessment, whereas cone-beam computed tomography datasets scored the lowest in all categories. These findings revealed a scarcity of publicly available imaging dental data and inconsistent metadata reporting. To promote the development of robust, equitable, and generalizable AI tools for dental diagnostics, treatment, and research, efforts are needed to address data scarcity, increase diversity, mandate metadata completeness, and ensure FAIRness in AI dental imaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.