Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39422477›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Clinical Outcome of Induction Treatment in the Era of Novel Agents and the Impact of the Number of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities (HRA) on Prognosis of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Insights From a Multicenter Study.

Dong Liang, Xiaojin Li, Shenrui Bai, Qiaoli Wang, Min Zeng, Demei Feng, Bo Lu, Xiaoqing Li, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianyun Li and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dong LiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8862-223X
Xiaojin LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shenrui BaiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2804-6292
Qiaoli WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Min ZengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Demei FengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Bo LuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoqing LiHematology Department, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhiqiang SunHematology Department, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Jianyun LiHematology Department, People's Hospital of Shenzhen Bao an District, Shenzhen, China.
Huanhuan ZhouHematology Department, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jialu ZhangHematology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xiaoqin ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongjun XiaState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yang LiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hua WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9751-8847

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81700148National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873428Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515010093Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515011862Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams 2017ZT07S096Sun Yat-Sen University Start-Up Funding 201603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of novel agents, the clinical outcomes of induction treatment and the impact of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) need to be explored.

objectiveThrough this study, we aim to analyze the effectiveness of different induction treatments and explore the survival outcomes of patients with varying numbers of HRA.

methodsA total of 734 patients from seven medical centers were included in our study.

resultsPatients in the CD38 monoclonal antibody or IMiDs plus proteasome inhibitors (PI) groups had significantly superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those receiving IMiDs or PI alone. Additionally, the CD38 monoclonal antibody conferred a PFS advantage over IMiDs plus PI. Patients with ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA) exhibited an extremely poor prognosis and should be considered ultra-high-risk individuals in multiple myeloma (MM). The CD38 monoclonal antibody, transplantation, and achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity only partly mitigated the poor prognosis in patients with HRA. Furthermore, patients with 1q21 gain/amplification (1q21+) only had a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients without HRA, and those with 1q21+ plus del17p or t(4;14) exhibited an inferior prognosis compared to those with 1q21+ alone.

conclusionOur results suggested that double-hit multiple myeloma was associated with extremely poor survival outcomes, and more effective treatments needed to be explored for this particular subtype of MM.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsMultiple MyelomaADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProteasome InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1Proteasome Inhibitors1q21 gain/amplificationCD38high risk cytogenetic abnormalitiesnewly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID39422477
PMCPMC11487677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.