ArticleACR open rheumatology2025
Geographic Socioeconomic Influences on Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis in an Academic and Safety Net Hospital System.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) on disease activity and cardiovascular comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
methodsA retrospective analysis of adult patients with RA was conducted to highlight differences in academic and safety net hospital clinics. Demographics, RA medication history, patient portal engagement, primary care presence, emergency or inpatient visits, RA disease activity and functional scores, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) presence were captured. The ADI rank was assigned using nine-digit zip codes. Patients were stratified by the upper versus lower ADI decile group and matched by age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and CCI using propensity score analysis.
resultsPatients with RA from the academic practice (n = 542) and the safety net hospital (n = 496) were assessed. In the academic cohort, those with high ADI scores (>8, more deprivation) had higher RA disease activity scores (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 mean ± SD: high 13.83 ± 6.94 vs low 11.17 ± 7.37, P < 0.0001; Clinical Disease Activity Index mean ± SD: high 11.97 ± 11.74 vs low 9.40 ± 7.97, P < 0.05), more functional impairment (Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire mean ± SD: high 2.99 ± 2.29 vs low 2.34 ± 2.23, P < 0.01), lower MyChart use (P < 0.001), and different smoking history (P < 0.01) compared to those with low ADI scores (<3, less deprivation). In the safety net cohort, there was a statistically significant difference only in smoking status (P < 0.05). CVD was not significantly different in either cohort.
conclusionThe absence of differences in RA disease activity and functional impairment in patients suggests that the ADI may not be as effective at predicting RA disease activity specifically in a safety net health care context. Identifying the discrepancies between the two systems may elucidate areas of improvement for patient care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.