ArticleChemSusChem2025
Novel Binders for Aqueous Electrode Processing of Electrochemical Capacitors.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review: Insight on Porous Carbon Positive Electrode for Sodium-Ion Capacitors: Interplay Between Synthesis, Properties, and Performance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work studies the use of epoxy and polyurethane formulations as binders for the aqueous processing of activated carbon (AC) electrodes used as positive and negative electrodes in Electrochemical Double Layer Capacitors (EDLCs). The use of amine and carbodiimide as crosslinkers is also evaluated. The mechanical properties of those different binders have been investigated, looking towards aqueous processable and flexible electrodes. Microstructural analysis of the fabricated AC electrodes has been carried out to understand the pore-blocking effect exhibited by certain polymers. Furthermore, electrochemical characterization of all the systems has been performed by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and constant current charge/discharge measurements at different current densities. The obtained results show that polyurethane (PU) outperforms in terms of energy and power density the carboxymethyl cellulose:styrene butadiene rubber (CMC : SBR) reference system. Moreover, the studied polyurethanes maintain close to 100 % of their initial capacitance after 2500 cycles under a current density of 5 A g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.