Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421971›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2024

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Comparison of Risk Category Predictions of Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation Score-2 and 4 Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment Tools Among People Living with Human Immunodefficiency Virus in Türkiye.

Elif Tükenmez Tigen, Deniz Gökengin, Hülya Özkan Özdemir, Halis Akalın, Bülent Kaya, Aydın Deveci, Asuman İnan, Dilara İnan, Adalet Altunsoy, Ayşe Serra Özel and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Elif Tükenmez TigenDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Marmara University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Deniz GökenginDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ege University Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.
Hülya Özkan ÖzdemirDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.
Halis AkalınDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Uludağ University Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.
Bülent KayaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Aydın DeveciDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye.
Asuman İnanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Dilara İnanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Akdeniz University Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye.
Adalet AltunsoyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ayşe Serra ÖzelDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
İlkay KaraoğlanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Haluk EraksoyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, İstanbul University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Tuna DemirdalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.
Taner YıldırmakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Serhat BirengelDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara University Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ayşe İnciDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Arzu NazlıDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.
Bircan KayaaslanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Sevgi Özan KöseDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Pamukkale University Hospital, Denizli, Türkiye.
Çiğdem Ataman HatipoğluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yasemin EsenMSD Türkiye, and HIV-TR Study Group.
Tuba KoçMSD Türkiye, and HIV-TR Study Group.
Petek GilikMSD Türkiye, and HIV-TR Study Group.
Volkan KortenDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Marmara University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
HIV-TR Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality among people living with HIV (PLWH). We aimed to assess the prevalence of diagnosed CVD and the risk of CVD among PLWH using 5 different tools.

methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in 20 tertiary centers in Türkiye between October 2021 and March 2022, among 1425 PLWH aged 40-75 years. About 82.7% were male, with a median age of 51. Web-based tools for each score were used for CVD risk calculations.

resultsOf 1425 PLWH enrolled, 10.8% had confirmed CVD, and 1132 had their risk scores evaluated. Of those participants, 42.8% had a higher risk of CVD (10-year risk of atherosclerotic CVD risk score (ASCVD) above 7.5%), and according to the European Society of Cardiology systemic coronary risk evaluation 2 (SCORE2), 71.7% had a high- to very high-risk rate. The agreement between various CVD risk tools varied, with Framingham heart study risk score (FRS), modified FRS, data collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs (DAD), and SCORE2 for high-risk countries showing overall agreement rates of 82%, 94%, 91%, and 36%, respectively, compared to ASCVD. According to the 2021 European and 2019 American Cardiology guidelines, 75.3% and 47.1% of PLWH would be eligible for lipid-lowering agents, respectively.

conclusionThe diagnosed CVD prevalence highlighted the importance of monitoring cardiovascular health and comorbidities in this population. SCORE2 identified a greater number of individuals at high/very high risk compared to other prediction tools. The implementation of CVD prevention through lipid-lowering therapy was far from desired levels in our cohort.

Identifiers

PMID39421971
PMCPMC11633786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.