Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421948›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Working with Joanne Elphinston Movement Systems

Monica Johansson, Gun Rembeck, Lena Nordeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica JohanssonPrimary Care. Region Västra Götaland, Primary Health Care, Närhälsan Sollebrunn Rehabmottagning, Sollebrunn, Sweden.
Gun RembeckResearch, Education, Development and Innovation Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden.
Lena NordemanResearch, Education, Development and Innovation Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJEMS MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this qualitative description study, we invited 13 PTs to focus group discussions (FGD). Four groups were conducted, three FGD at different locations in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, and one FGD using Skype. The groups met on one occasion. The FGD method has a qualitative semi-structured research design based on a social constructivist tradition of research. Data were analyzed using the Kreuger method, considering the content of the discussion in a collective understanding of the subject and the interaction taking place among participants.

resultsThree themes were identified: how the PTs describe their practical and emotional experiences, and how JEMS

conclusionsThe FGD was chosen to capture the variety and width of experiences of the PTs using JEMS

Indexed as

Focus GroupsPhysical TherapistsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSwedenfocus groupMovementphysiotherapyqualitative researchrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39421948
PMCPMC11492384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.