ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Severe allergic rash induced by icodextrin: case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Icodextrin is a type of peritoneal dialysis (PD) osmolyte that can be extended retention times (8-16 h) and may offer a viable alternative to conventional glucose dialysis solutions for PD patients. Nonetheless, prolonged use of icodextrin may lead to allergic rash, and rarely severe skin lesions. Case presentation: In February 2024, a 45-year-old male was admitted to the Department of Nephrology at Shaoxing Second Hospital presenting with a 3-day history of intense generalized pruritic erythematous rash. Physical examination revealed diffuse erythematous pruritic rash and exfoliative rash, particularly on the abdominal. Abnormal laboratory findings included elevated eosinophil count and total IgE levels, indicative of an allergic rash. Standard anti-allergic regim was initiated. However, on the third day in the hospital, the patient developed new pustules on his neck and arms. Subsequent historical investigation uncovered that the individual had previously administered icodextrin 2 weeks prior due to volume overload, and the last intraperitoneal administration time was second day of hospitalization. The dermatologist rendered a diagnosis of generalized exfoliative rash and acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) induced by icodextrin, and initiated prophylactic antimicrobial therapy accordingly. Furthermore, the patient declined to undergo a skin biopsy. Noteworthy is the observation that the rash ameliorated and the pustules resolved by the seventh day post-admission. Presently, the patient is still under clinical follow-up. Conclusion: This article aims to report the first case of severe allergic rash caused by icodextrin in Chinese PD patients and highlight the potential for icodextrin to trigger ALEP. A literature review of similar cases found that severe allergic rash induced by icodextrin is rare, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood, and the prognosis is positive with proper treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.