Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421857›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Incidental findings on MRI for the evaluation of endometriosis: prevalence and clinical significance.

Sebastian Harth, Fritz Christian Roller, Alexander Brose, Hasan Emin Kaya, Felix Zeppernick, Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein, Gabriele Anja Krombach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastian HarthDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Fritz Christian RollerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Alexander BroseDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Hasan Emin KayaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Görükle Campus, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Felix ZeppernickDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Ivo Meinhold-HeerleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Gabriele Anja KrombachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental findings on MRI for endometriosis. Differences between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were to be examined. Methods: This was a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional single-center study. All patients who received a pelvic MRI for endometriosis between April 2021 and February 2023 were included. The presence and frequency of incidental findings were noted after review of all MR images and radiology reports. The potential clinical significance of the findings was analyzed. Differences in the frequency of incidental findings between patients with and without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI were evaluated, utilizing the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney Results: 303 consecutive patients (mean age, 33.4 years ± 8.3) were evaluated. Incidental findings were noted in 299/303 (98.7%) patients. Most frequently, ossification of the hip acetabular rim and degenerative changes of the lumbar spine were noted. In 25/303 (8.3%) patients, incidental findings had high clinical significance. For specific incidental findings, significantly higher prevalences were found in patients with than in patients without evidence of deep infiltrating endometriosis on MRI (hip acetabular rim ossification, Conclusions: Incidental findings are very common on pelvic MRI for endometriosis. The detection of incidental findings can lead to the diagnosis of relevant diseases and thus enable early treatment. On the other hand, many incidental findings have no, only minor, or uncertain consequences.

Indexed as

diagnostic imagingendometriosisincidental findingsmagnetic resonance imagingpelvis

Identifiers

PMID39421857
PMCPMC11483601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.