Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421856›Full record

ArticleSignals2024

The Effect of Jittered Stimulus Onset Interval on Electrophysiological Markers of Attention in a Brain-Computer Interface Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Paradigm.

Daniel Klee, Tab Memmott, Barry Oken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Signals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel KleeDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Tab MemmottDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Barry OkenDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066518 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary Beattie · 2020 to 2026
$28.6M
Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain responses to discrete stimuli are modulated when multiple stimuli are presented in sequence. These alterations are especially pronounced when the time course of an evoked response overlaps with responses to subsequent stimuli, such as in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm used to control a brain-computer interface (BCI). The present study explored whether the measurement or classification of select brain responses during RSVP would improve through application of an established technique for dealing with overlapping stimulus presentations, known as irregular or "jittered" stimulus onset interval (SOI). EEG data were collected from 24 healthy adult participants across multiple rounds of RSVP calibration and copy phrase tasks with varying degrees of SOI jitter. Analyses measured three separate brain signals sensitive to attention: N200, P300, and occipitoparietal alpha attenuation. Presentation jitter visibly reduced intrusion of the SSVEP, but in general, it did not positively or negatively affect attention effects, classification, or system performance. Though it remains unclear whether stimulus overlap is detrimental to BCI performance overall, the present study demonstrates that single-trial classification approaches may be resilient to rhythmic intrusions like SSVEP that appear in the averaged EEG.

Indexed as

alpha attenuationattentionbrain–computer interface (BCI)electroencephalography (EEG)event-related potential (ERP)N200P300steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)stimulus onset interval (SOI) jitter

Identifiers

PMID39421856
PMCPMC11486514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.