Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421787›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2024

Biometry study of foveal isoplanatic patch variation for adaptive optics retinal imaging.

Xiaojing Huang, Aubrey Hargrave, Julie Bentley, Alfredo Dubra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaojing HuangInstitute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14620, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-985X
Aubrey HargraveByers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94303, USA.
Julie BentleyInstitute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14620, USA.
Alfredo DubraByers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-9020

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Increasing the isoplanatic patch in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopyR01EY032147 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Improving rigor and reproducibility in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopyR01EY031360 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2020 to 2023
$2.3M
Structural and functional tests of ganglion cell damage in glaucomaR01EY030361 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDBERG, JEFFREY L, NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
Low Latency Eye-Motion CompensationR01EY032669 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030361NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032147NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The change in ocular wavefront aberrations with visual angle determines the isoplanatic patch, defined as the largest field of view over which diffraction-limited retinal imaging can be achieved. Here, we study how the isoplanatic patch at the foveal center varies across 32 schematic eyes, each individualized with optical biometry estimates of corneal and crystalline lens surface topography, assuming a homogeneous refractive index for the crystalline lens. The foveal isoplanatic patches were calculated using real ray tracing through 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm pupil diameters for wavelengths of 400-1200 nm, simulating five adaptive optics (AO) strategies. Three of these strategies, used in flood illumination, point-scanning, and line-scanning ophthalmoscopes, apply the same wavefront correction across the entire field of view, resulting in almost identical isoplanatic patches. Two time-division multiplexing (TDM) strategies are proposed to increase the isoplanatic patch of AO scanning ophthalmoscopes through field-varying wavefront correction. Results revealed substantial variation in isoplanatic patch size across eyes (40-500%), indicating that the field of view in AO ophthalmoscopes should be adjusted for each eye. The median isoplanatic patch size decreases with increasing pupil diameter, coarsely following a power law. No statistically significant correlations were found between isoplanatic patch size and axial length. The foveal isoplanatic patch increases linearly with wavelength, primarily due to its wavelength-dependent definition (wavefront root-mean-squared, RMS <λ/14), rather than aberration chromatism. Additionally, ray tracing reveals that in strongly ametropic eyes, induced aberrations can result in wavefront RMS errors as large as λ/3 for an 8-mm pupil, with implications for wavefront sensing, open-loop ophthalmic AO, spectacle prescription and refractive surgery.

Identifiers

PMID39421787
PMCPMC11482173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.