ArticlePhotoacoustics2024
Laser ultrasound wave pattern analysis for efficient defect detection in samples with curved surfaces.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted laser ultrasound method for the estimation of porosity in hairpin weld seams.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many production processes involve curved sample surfaces, such as welding or additive manufacturing. These pose new challenges to characterization methods for quality inspection, which are usually optimized for flat extended sample geometries. In this paper, we present a laser ultrasound (LUS) method that can be used to efficiently detect defects (e.g., voids), without extensive scanning effort and without a prior knowledge of the defect location, in finite samples with curved surfaces. The developed method starts with generalized simulations of the LUS wave patterns in samples with varying radii of curvature and width as well as varying excitation size and mechanism (thermoelastic or ablative). Based on the wave pattern analysis, it is possible to predict how every point in the weld can be reached with only few excitation spots. In a second step, we assume a grid of finite size defects at locations at which such voids are most likely formed and perform a thorough simulation analysis that is based on B-Scans to find a few pairs of excitation-detection points most favorable for finding defects anywhere in the weld seam. These results are then compared to the wave pattern analysis, discussing similarities and deviations from the predictions. In a final step, the simulations are compared to experimental results, verifying the almost threefold increase in the detectability of defects by choosing the predicted optimal excitation-detection positions. It is expected that this method will significantly improve the reliability and time efficiency of detecting internal defects in samples with curved surfaces in potential industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.