ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2024
Treatment of penetrating injuries of the retrohepatic vena cava: systematic review protocol.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment of penetrating injuries to the retrohepatic inferior vena cava: a systematic review.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries to the retrohepatic segment of the inferior vena cava require complex procedures, as exposure without prior vascular control can lead to uncontrollable and fatal bleeding. To achieve such control, the classic techniques of hepatic vascular exclusion and the implantation of an atriocaval shunt have been described, and more recently, endovascular strategies have been reported. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding which of these strategies is associated with lower mortality. In order to determine which therapeutic strategy presents the lowest mortality and complication rates in the treatment of penetrating injuries to the retrohepatic segment of the inferior vena cava, a systematic review of the literature will be conducted, registered on the PROSPERO platform under the number CRD42023464133. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will guide the process. Searches will be carried out in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) will be consulted to detect ongoing or unpublished trials. Studies will be selected based on a predefined search strategy, the number of results will be filtered using the Rayyan app, and the studies included will be independently reviewed by two authors to reach a final consensus. The qualitative analysis of the studies will be conducted using the RoB 1.0 tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.