Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421648›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2024

The ethics of knowledge sharing: a feminist examination of intellectual property rights and open-source materials in gender transformative methodologies.

Leah Goldmann, Alice Welbourn, Diane Gillespie, Nastnet Ghebrebhran, Lufuno Barro, Sara Siebert, Hawa Kagoya, Lori Michau, Anjalee Kohli, Tina Musuya and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leah GoldmannRaising Voices, Violence Against Women Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Alice WelbournSalamander Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Diane GillespieUniversity of Washington Bothell, Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Psychology, Bothell, WA, United States.
Nastnet GhebrebhranRaising Voices, Violence Against Women Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Lufuno BarroIMAGE (Intervention with Microfinance for AIDS and Gender Equality), Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sara SiebertRaising Voices, Violence Against Women Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Hawa KagoyaIndependent Consultant, Kampala, Uganda.
Lori MichauRaising Voices, Violence Against Women Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Anjalee KohliIndependent Consultant, Washington, DC, United States.
Tina MusuyaSocial Development Direct, Gender-Based Violence, London, United Kingdom.
Sonia Rebecca KusiimaTUJAYEPA, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debates on intellectual property rights and open source frequently stem from the business sector and higher education, where goals are typically oriented toward profit, academic status, credit, and/or reputation. What happens if we reconsider the ethics of intellectual property rights and open source when our driving motivation is advancing women's health and rights? How does this prioritization complicate our assumptions of copyright and open access? How can we embark on a journey that validates the complex realities of multiple stakeholders who have good intent, but do not always consider the unintended impacts and the broader power dynamics at play? This paper explores the tensions and nuances of sharing methodologies that aim to transform harmful gender norms in an ecosystem that does not always consider the complex challenges behind intellectual property and open-source material. As a thought-collective dedicated to using a feminist approach to unpack and promote the principles of ethical, effective, and sustainable scale, we hope to underscore how the current research and debates on intellectual property rights and open-source material have good aims but may also fall short in encompassing the realities of gendered social norms change in and with communities around the world. We conclude with key recommendations for donors, researchers, International Development Corporations, International Non-Governmental Organizations, and those interested in using or adapting dynamic, gender transformative materials created by others.

Indexed as

feminist methodologiesgender transformative approachintellectual property (IP)open source (OS)social norms change

Identifiers

PMID39421648
PMCPMC11484087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.