Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421585›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2024

Refining Liposuction Safety and Efficacy: Surgeon Learning-Curve Analysis With Helium-Based Plasma Integration.

Paul G Ruff, Allison Martinez, Nicholas Burpee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison Martinez
Nicholas Burpee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The introduction of medical advancements requires ongoing critical evaluation of clinical practice and patient outcomes to improve results and safety. Since the development of minimally invasive, energy-based devices, this process has been occurring throughout the field of aesthetic medicine. Objectives: To collect retrospective procedure and safety data of liposuction procedures with or without adjunct utilization of a helium-based plasma device, compare 3 groups, and delineate the learning curve. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a single site included healthy patients ≥18 years of age treated by the principal investigator (PI). A total of 50 patients had an ultrasonic-assisted liposuction procedure, 50 patients had a liposuction procedure with the utilization of the helium-based plasma device, and 50 of the PI's most recent patients had a liposuction procedure with the utilization of the helium-based plasma device. All patients had at least 6 months of documented postoperative follow-up care. Results: Totally, 150 patients were enrolled in the study. Most patients had multiple body areas treated, primarily hips and abdomen. Treatment settings varied, with significant relationships found between pain and treatment groups ( Conclusions: The data collected support that patient outcomes and safety improve with continued use of the helium-based plasma device by the PI. The data also support the use of a helium-based plasma device as safe when used in combination with liposuction procedures. Level of Evidence 4 Therapeutic:

Identifiers

PMID39421585
PMCPMC11483499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.