Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421530›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

ANN uncertainty estimates in assessing fatty liver content from ultrasound data.

G Del Corso, M A Pascali, C Caudai, L De Rosa, A Salvati, M Mancini, L Ghiadoni, F Bonino, M R Brunetto, S Colantonio and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G Del CorsoInstitute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo" (ISTI) - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.
M A PascaliInstitute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo" (ISTI) - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.
C CaudaiInstitute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo" (ISTI) - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.
L De RosaInstitute of Clinical Physiology - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.
A SalvatiHepatology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
M ManciniInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
L GhiadoniEmergency Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
F BoninoInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
M R BrunettoHepatology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
S ColantonioInstitute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo" (ISTI) - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.
F FaitaInstitute of Clinical Physiology - National Research Council of Italy (CNR) - Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: This article uses three different probabilistic convolutional architectures applied to ultrasound image analysis for grading Fatty Liver Content (FLC) in Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) patients. Steatosis is a new silent epidemic and its accurate measurement is an impelling clinical need, not only for hepatologists, but also for experts in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. This paper aims to provide a robust comparison between different uncertainty quantification strategies to identify advantages and drawbacks in a real clinical setting. Methods: We used a classical Convolutional Neural Network, a Monte Carlo Dropout, and a Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network with the goal of not only comparing the goodness of the predictions, but also to have access to an evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the outputs. Results: We found that even if the prediction based on a single ultrasound view is reliable (relative RMSE [5.93%-12.04%]), networks based on two ultrasound views outperform them (relative RMSE [5.35%-5.87%]). In addition, the results show that the introduction of a "not confident" category contributes to increase the percentage of correctly predicted cases and to decrease the percentage of mispredicted cases, especially for semi-intrusive methods. Conclusions: The possibility of having access to information about the confidence with which the network produces its outputs is a great advantage, both from the point of view of physicians who want to use neural networks as computer-aided diagnosis, and for developers who want to limit overfitting and obtain information about dataset problems in terms of out-of-distribution detection.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networksBayesian uncertaintyFatty liver contentUltrasound imagingUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID39421530
PMCPMC11483457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.