ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
ANN uncertainty estimates in assessing fatty liver content from ultrasound data.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of AI in Hepatic Steatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Hepatic Fat Quantification Using Beta Distribution and a Probabilistic Neural Network in a Prepubertal Male Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based uncertainty quantification for quality assurance in hepatobiliary imaging-based techniques.Oncotarget · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: This article uses three different probabilistic convolutional architectures applied to ultrasound image analysis for grading Fatty Liver Content (FLC) in Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) patients. Steatosis is a new silent epidemic and its accurate measurement is an impelling clinical need, not only for hepatologists, but also for experts in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. This paper aims to provide a robust comparison between different uncertainty quantification strategies to identify advantages and drawbacks in a real clinical setting. Methods: We used a classical Convolutional Neural Network, a Monte Carlo Dropout, and a Bayesian Convolutional Neural Network with the goal of not only comparing the goodness of the predictions, but also to have access to an evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the outputs. Results: We found that even if the prediction based on a single ultrasound view is reliable (relative RMSE [5.93%-12.04%]), networks based on two ultrasound views outperform them (relative RMSE [5.35%-5.87%]). In addition, the results show that the introduction of a "not confident" category contributes to increase the percentage of correctly predicted cases and to decrease the percentage of mispredicted cases, especially for semi-intrusive methods. Conclusions: The possibility of having access to information about the confidence with which the network produces its outputs is a great advantage, both from the point of view of physicians who want to use neural networks as computer-aided diagnosis, and for developers who want to limit overfitting and obtain information about dataset problems in terms of out-of-distribution detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.