ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- VCboost: reducing false positives in long-read variant calling for single-nucleotide polymorphism and indel detection in challenging genomic regions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The transformative impact of ultra-rapid nanopore sequencing in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mapping single-cell diploid chromatin fiber architectures using DAF-seq.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- The Clinical and Genetic Landscape of a French Multicenter Cohort of 2563 Epilepsy Patients Referred for Genetic Diagnosis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- The additional diagnostic yield of long-read sequencing in undiagnosed rare diseases.Genome research · 2025Review
- Concordance of Whole-Genome Long-Read Sequencing with Standard Clinical Testing for Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
- Moving Beyond Oxford Nanopore Standard Procedures: New Insights from Water and Multiple Fish Microbiomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Local read haplotagging enables accurate long-read small variant calling.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Functional categorization of gene regulatory variants that cause Mendelian conditions.Human genetics · 2024Review
- Rapid genomic sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis and therapy in intensive care units: a review.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Review
- Efficient mapping of accurate long reads in minimizer space with mapquik.Genome research · 2023Article
- Applications of long-read sequencing to Mendelian genetics.Genome medicine · 2023Review
- Accelerated nanopore basecalling with SLOW5 data format.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Rapid genetic testing in the critical care setting may guide diagnostic evaluation, direct therapies, and help families and care providers make informed decisions about goals of care. We tested whether a simplified DNA extraction and library preparation process would enable us to perform ultra-rapid assessment of genetic risk for a Mendelian condition, based on information from an affected sibling, using long-read genome sequencing and targeted analysis. Methods: Following extraction of DNA from cord blood and rapid library preparation, genome sequencing was performed on an Oxford Nanopore PromethION. FASTQ files were generated from original sequencing data in near real-time and aligned to a reference genome. Variant calling and analysis were performed at timed intervals. Results: We optimized the DNA extraction and library preparation methods to create sufficient library for sequencing from 500 μL of blood. Real-time, targeted analysis was performed to determine that the newborn was neither affected nor a heterozygote for variants underlying a Mendelian condition. Phasing of the target region and prior knowledge of the affected haplotypes supported our interpretation despite a low level of coverage at 3 hours of life. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept experiment demonstrates how prior knowledge of haplotype structure or familial variants can be used to rapidly evaluate an individual at risk for a genetic disease. While ultra-rapid sequencing remains both complex and cost prohibitive, our method is more easily automated than prior approaches and uses smaller volumes of blood, thus may be more easily adopted for future studies of ultra-rapid genome sequencing in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.