Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Comparison of the efficacy of tibial transverse transfer and periosteal distraction techniques in the treatment of diabetic foot refractory ulcers.

Yang Yang, Fang Chen, Yiguo Chen, Wei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang YangDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Fang Chen *Department of Infectious Disease, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Yiguo ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of comparing tibia transverse transport (TTT) and periosteal distraction in treating diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with both procedures between February 2020 and November 2022, 8 of whom were treated with the tibial transverse transfer technique (transfer group) and 11 with the osteochondral distraction technique (distraction group), was performed to compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of the two methods. Results: All wounds were healed in both groups, and the healing time ranged from 15 to 41days with a mean of 28d. The limb preservation rate was 100%. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and pain score in the operative area were significantly less in the distraction group than in the removal group, with statistically significant differences ( Conclusions: The Periosteal distraction technique can significantly promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. It has the same efficacy as TTT in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcer wounds and improving the peripheral circulation of affected limbs. In addition, the periosteal distraction technique has the advantages of small trauma, simple operation, few complications, and convenient nursing care.

Indexed as

diabetesdiabetic foot ulcersdistraction osteogenesisperiosteal distractiontibial transverse transfer technique

Identifiers

PMID39421408
PMCPMC11484059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.