ArticleOTO open
Investigating Predictors of Decannulation Through Endoscopic Approach in Patients With Tracheostomy and Peristomal Subglottic Stenosis.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rostral direction virtual laryngoscopy in canine glottis under sedation with butorphanol, medetomidine, and alfaxalone.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors of Successful Decannulation in Tracheostomy Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Peristomal subglottic stenosis (SGS) is a common sequela after tracheostomy, with severe cases precluding decannulation. Predictors of decannulation success in these patients following endoscopic intervention are not well studied. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of successful decannulation and inform treatment decisions. Study Design: This study is a retrospective case series of 22 adult patients presenting to the senior author with a tracheostomy and peristomal SGS precluding decannulation between 2018 and 2023. Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson. Methods: Patient demographics, relevant clinical factors, stenosis characteristics, and the number of endoscopic procedures performed were analyzed to identify predictors of successful decannulation. Endoscopic interventions were generally performed 3 months apart with CO Results: Out of the 22 patients in the study, 9 (40.9%) achieved decannulation, all through an endoscopic approach. Body mass index (BMI) and age were identified as significant negative predictors of decannulation success ( Conclusion: A 40.9% decannulation rate was achieved in our cohort. BMI and age were identified as negative predictors of decannulation success. Stenosis characteristics did not significantly affect decannulation outcomes. Further investigation is warranted to establish reliable predictors of decannulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.