ArticleHeliyon2024
Drivers of variation in fuel choice for cooking: From the selected towns of North Shoa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting household cooking fuel choice in sub-Saharan Africa using supervised machine learning analysis of DHS data from 28 countries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A case study discovering lock-in effects of culinary culture and behaviours on cooking energy use in Chinese homes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine household fuel choice behaviour and drivers of variation in fuel choice for cooking. It utilizes descriptive statistics, ordered logit model and generalized ordered logit model to analyze the influence of independent variables upon dependent variables. The result shows that, mixed fuels are the dominant sources of energy with 43.75 % followed by unclean fuel with 33.25 % and then clean fuel with 23 %. This confirms 'households' Fuel-Stacking behaviour. The result of the ordered logit model suggest that variables like family size, per monthly income, the gender of household head, household ownership of electric meter, ownership of housing unit, marital status, age, occupation, educational levels of household heads, and the number of the adult females are statistically significant at 1 %, 5 %, and 10 % while, place of residence and occupation (self-non agriculture) are statistically insignificant to determine fuel choice. Identifying the fuels which are chosen by households should serve as a guide for government and policymakers in the formulation and implementation of policies and strategies that will guarantee optimal access to clean energy sources. Therefore, the government should improve the supply and distribution of electric meters by subsidizing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.