ArticleHeliyon2024
A modified solution for evaluating the sliding direction and stability of 3D slopes.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we present an improved and efficient analytical solution for evaluating the stability of 3D slopes based on the minimum potential energy method. The equilibrium equation of the landslide is employed to determine the shear stress on the failure surface, and a new formulation for shear potential energy is introduced. The vector-combined direction of the force acting on the landslide is considered equivalent to the sliding direction (SD). Two classic examples are reanalyzed to validate the accuracy and performance of the proposed method. The analysis demonstrates that the obtained results align well with reference solutions and tend to be conservative in engineering applications. Parameter investigations are conducted to explore the influences of SD, shear strength parameters, slope angle, and soil unit weight on the safety factor (SF) of 3D slopes. The findings indicate that a larger SD corresponds to a less stable slope. Finally, the effects of optimization parameters, landslide volume, and surcharge on the location of the failure surface, SF, and SD are also examined. The developed analytical approach offers a novel and straightforward solution with sufficient accuracy and eliminates the need for iteration in determining the SF, making it a valuable complementary method for assessing the stability of 3D slopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.