Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421375›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

MuTCELM: An optimal multi-TextCNN-based ensemble learning for text classification.

Victor Kwaku Agbesi, Wenyu Chen, Sophyani Banaamwini Yussif, Chiagoziem C Ukwuoma, Yeong Hyeon Gu, Mugahed A Al-Antari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Kwaku AgbesiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wenyu ChenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sophyani Banaamwini YussifSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chiagoziem C UkwuomaSichuan Engineering Technology Research Center for Industrial Internet Intelligent Monitoring and Application, Chengdu University of Technology, No. 610059, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yeong Hyeon GuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of AI Convergence, Daeyang AI Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
Mugahed A Al-AntariDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, College of AI Convergence, Daeyang AI Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature extraction plays a critical role in text classification, as it converts textual data into numerical representations suitable for machine learning models. A key challenge lies in effectively capturing both semantic and contextual information from text at various levels of granularity while avoiding overfitting. Prior methods have often demonstrated suboptimal performance, largely due to the limitations of the feature extraction techniques employed. To address these challenges, this study introduces Multi-TextCNN, an advanced feature extractor designed to capture essential textual information across multiple levels of granularity. Multi-TextCNN is integrated into a proposed classification model named MuTCELM, which aims to enhance text classification performance. The proposed MuTCELM leverages five distinct sub-classifiers, each designed to capture different linguistic features from the text data. These sub-classifiers are integrated into an ensemble framework, enhancing the overall model performance by combining their complementary strengths. Empirical results indicate that MuTCELM achieves average improvements across all datasets in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-macro scores by 0.2584, 0.2546, 0.2668, and 0.2612, respectively, demonstrating significant performance gains over baseline models. These findings underscore the effectiveness of Multi-TextCNN in improving model performance relative to other ensemble methods. Further analysis reveals that the non-overlapping confidence intervals between MuTCELM and baseline models indicate statistically significant differences, suggesting that the observed performance improvements of MuTCELM are not attributable to random chance but are indeed statistically meaningful. This evidence indicates the robustness and superiority of MuTCELM across various languages and text classification tasks.

Indexed as

Deep learningEnsemble learningFeature extractionMulti-TextCNNText classification

Identifiers

PMID39421375
PMCPMC11483334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.