ArticleHeliyon2024
Does cluster beekeeping improve the efficiency of honey production in participant households in southwestern Ethiopia?
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand the determinants of participation in cluster beekeeping and its impact on the technical efficiency of honey production in southwestern Ethiopia. To this end, cross-sectional data from a household survey conducted in 2023 from 385 sample households in 3 districts were used for the analysis. An endogenous switching regression model with a probit model was used to analyze the impact of clustering beekeepers on the technical efficacy of honey production. The results of the study showed that honey production was significantly and favorably affected by the total number of hives, type of hive, and distance to an accessible forest. As indicated by the average technical efficiency (TE) at 72 %, the actual quantity of production differed from the desired production volume. The results show that the gender of the household head, access to training, access to credit, market information, frequency of extension contacts, and age of the household head are the most important determinants of households' decision to participate in group beekeeping. In addition, the result of the endogenous switching regression (ESR) model shows that participation in group beekeeping has a positive and significant effect on honey production efficiency as measured by technical efficiency (TE). Farmers who participated in cluster beekeeping were technically less inefficient than those who did not participate. Therefore, policies and development strategies that encourage further participation in cluster beekeeping could improve the efficiency of honey production of smallholder farmers in Jimma Zone, southwestern Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.