Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421318›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2024

β‑catenin expression in endometrioid type endometrial cancer: Expression patterns and impact on disease outcomes.

Orkun Han, Aysun Alci, Hulya Tosun Yildirim, Mustafa Gokkaya, Necim Yalcin, Selim Kandemir, Mehmet Goksu, Isin Ureyen, Tayfun Toptas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Orkun HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Aysun AlciDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Hulya Tosun YildirimDepartment of Pathology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Mustafa GokkayaDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Necim YalcinDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Selim KandemirDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Mehmet GoksuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Isin UreyenDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Tayfun ToptasDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of nuclear and/or cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin by immunohistochemistry in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) may constitute a potential diagnostic method for identifying patients with a catenin β1 (CTNNB1) gene mutation and those at risk of disease recurrence. The present study aimed to investigate β-catenin expression patterns in hysterectomy specimens of patients with endometrioid type EC using immunohistochemistry, and to examine the prognostic impact of β-catenin. The study was a single-institutional, retrospective cohort trial enrolling consecutive patients with a postoperative histopathological diagnosis of endometrioid EC who underwent hysterectomy between January 2015 and December 2018. Histopathology slides from 75 patients were stained with a monoclonal antibody targeting the β-catenin protein. Any percentage of nuclear staining, whether focal or diffuse, was considered 'β-catenin nuclear-positive'. The cytoplasmic staining reaction of β-catenin was assessed based on the percentage of stained cells and staining intensity. Immune-reactivity score (IRS) values were determined by multiplying the scores for the percentage of staining and staining intensity. IRS values 0 to 2 were regarded as negative expression, 3 to 4 as low expression, 6 to 8 as moderate expression, and 9 to 12 as high expression. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was used as the prognostic endpoint. Only 2 out of 75 tissue samples (2.7%) exhibited nuclear β-catenin expression, with a low staining percentage of 5%. By contrast, cytoplasmic staining was observed in all samples (100%). According to the IRS findings, 1.3% of the samples exhibited negative cytoplasmic expression, 42.7% low expression, 38.7% moderate expression and 17.3% high expression. Cox regression analysis revealed that staining with β-catenin, either nuclear or cytoplasmic, had no impact on RFS, and stage was the sole independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, based on these results, β-catenin expression in endometrioid EC was revealed to be mostly cytoplasmic, with only 2.7% of tissue samples exhibiting nuclear expression. Overall, β-catenin expression has no impact on RFS.

Indexed as

endometrioid endometrial cancerprognosissurvivalβ-catenin

Identifiers

PMID39421318
PMCPMC11484180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.