Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421311›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Dubbing language-therapy CINEma-based in aphasia post-stroke (DULCINEA): A feasibility randomized crossover controlled trial.

Blanca Fuentes, Pablo Jordi-Perea, Cristian Sempere-Iborra, Aida Tarifa-Rodríguez, Elena de Celis-Ruiz, Marta Martín Alonso, Gerardo Ruiz-Ares, Ricardo Rigual, Jorge Rodríguez-Pardo, Elisa Alonso-López and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Blanca FuentesDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-862X
Pablo Jordi-PereaNeurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Cristian Sempere-IborraNeurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Aida Tarifa-RodríguezDepartment of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elena de Celis-RuizDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Martín AlonsoSpeech and Language Unit. Department of Rehabilitation, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Gerardo Ruiz-AresDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo RigualDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Rodríguez-PardoDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Elisa Alonso-LópezDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
María Alonso de LeciñanaDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Centre, La Paz University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Neurosciences Area, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-6580
Javier Virués-OrtegaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alberto M BorobiaClinical Trials Unit. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
María Jiménez-GonzálezClinical Trials Unit. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
María Martínez-BalaguerClinical Trials Unit. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain.
Paloma BlancoAsociación Afasia Activa, Madrid, Spain.
Nereida BuenoDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Helping people recover from aphasia is among the top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of dubbing techniques (using newly developed software) for post-stroke aphasia therapy and explore its potential efficacy. Methods: Randomised, crossover, interventional, feasibility trial that included patients with chronic post-stroke non-fluent aphasia. The intervention consisted of an individualised programme (16 sessions; 8 weeks) based on dubbing words and sentences progressively adapted to the severity of the aphasia. Patients were allocated to groups that underwent therapy within the first 3 months, or between 3 and 6 months from inclusion, each group serving as the control during the non-therapy periods. Outcomes were the pre-post differences in the Communicative Activity Log, the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Stroke Aphasia Quality of Life Scale, and the Western Aphasia Battery Revised, administered by psychologists blinded to the patients' allocation. Results: Recruitment was limited due to COVID-19 and prematurely stopped because of funding coming to an end. A total of 23 patients were randomised, 20 of whom completed the study (1 withdrew consent, and 2 dropped out). The adherence rate to the allocated group was 95.3%. No statistically significant differences were found in any of the outcomes; however, 17 (85%) patients reported subjective improvements in communication skills. Conclusions: This trial shows the feasibility of dubbing therapy (using dedicated software) for patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia. Although it lacks statistical power, certain effects on language and communication cannot be ignored.

Indexed as

aphasiafeasibilityrandomised clinical trialsoftwareStroke < Disease

Identifiers

PMID39421311
PMCPMC11483829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.