ArticleDigital health
The implementation of smart continence care for people with disabilities: A qualitative study of key stakeholders' first-hand experiences.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Innovative technological applications like smart continence care (SCC) offer potential benefits in healthcare delivery, particularly for individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD). SCC aims to prompt caregivers to change continence materials, potentially improving clients' quality of life and reducing caregivers' workload. Although the use of SCC in PIMD care is promising, research is needed to improve its use in these complex settings. The aim of this study was to reflect on the SCC implementation process in care organizations for people with PIMD. Methods: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, caregivers, and SCC project leaders, across four care organizations. Interviews utilized an integrated framework drawing from the centre for eHealth research roadmap and the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework, both addressing eHealth implementation. Thematic analysis and open coding were employed to identify key themes and sub-themes in the implementation process. Results: Four main themes emerged as crucial for successful SCC implementation: creating support, communication between stakeholders, problem-solving, and willingness to adopt SCC. The first three themes were perceived as contributors to the success of SCC implementation, whereas the last theme showed factors impacting willingness to adopt SCC. Early involvement of key stakeholders and clear communication about expectations of their roles was perceived as crucial and created clarity. Adequate problem-solving was identified as influential in SCC utilization and willingness to adopt person-centred continence care. Conclusion: Implementation of SCC requires changes in the work routines of those involved, and key stakeholders' early involvement appears to improve support for these changes. Fostering communication between key stakeholders and adequate problem-solving contributes to positive experiences and the perceived success of sustainable implementation. This study offered a rich understanding of day-to-day practices around implementing SCC in disability care organizations. The findings may also be relevant for the implementation of technologies in other care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.