ArticleCureus2024
Optimizing Wrist Splint Fitting Parameters Through Artificial Intelligence Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Review
- A clinical study on the application of three-dimensionally printed splints combined with finite element analysis in paediatric distal radius fractures.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The current method for determining the appropriate wrist splint size in the clinical setting relies on measuring wrist circumference, but this approach often fails to ensure optimal fit. This study evaluates additional hand features using 3-dimensional (3D) scanned data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve the fit of pre-fabricated wrist splints. We hypothesize that wrist and forearm widths can provide a more accurate fitting than wrist circumference alone. Materials and methods We recruited 54 healthy volunteers to be scanned. Each volunteer was fitted with a standard wrist brace (Short Arm Brace, Ossur, Iceland), and 3D data from their hands were collected using an infrared-based 3D scanner (Einscan Pro, Shining3D, China). The 3D scanned data were then analyzed to identify and measure 14 distinct hand features. To explore the relationship between these hand features and the optimal splint size, we generated a categorical correlation map. This map identified hand features that were most strongly correlated with splint size categories (small, medium, large). Subsequently, we developed a classification algorithm to predict the appropriate splint size based on the correlated hand features. We utilized three different machine learning models for this purpose: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) Classifier, RandomForestClassifier, and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). Each of these classifiers was trained and evaluated to determine their accuracy and effectiveness in predicting the correct splint size. Results Wrist width showed the highest classification accuracy (91%) for both the XGB Classifier and RandomForestClassifier. The measurements including hand wrist width, mid-forearm width, and hand crease line width also performed well with the XGB Classifier, achieving an accuracy of 90%. The SVC showed consistent performance across various feature sets, with the highest accuracy of 81% for the measurements. Overall, these findings suggest that wrist width is the most predictive feature for splint size classification, with additional features providing minimal enhancement. Conclusions Artificial intelligence, combined with 3D scanning, can accurately predict wrist splint size from a single image acquisition, enabling contactless, personalized fitting. This approach can improve patient outcomes by enhancing the fit of prefabricated splints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.