Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421239›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

How low can we go with the dialysate flow? A retrospective study on the safety and adequacy of a water-saving dialysis prescription.

Alicja Rydzewska-Rosołowska, Irena Głowińska, Katarzyna Kakareko, Adam Pietruczuk, Tomasz Hryszko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A website calculator to benchmark the carbon footprint of haemodialysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alicja Rydzewska-Rosołowska2nd Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Internal Medicine with Dialysis Unit, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-3085
Irena Głowińska2nd Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Internal Medicine with Dialysis Unit, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.
Katarzyna Kakareko2nd Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Internal Medicine with Dialysis Unit, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.
Adam PietruczukDialysis Center, Sokółka Poland.
Tomasz Hryszko2nd Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Internal Medicine with Dialysis Unit, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Green nephrology encompasses all initiatives in kidney care that have a positive impact on climate and environment. To prepare the dialysate, at least 120 L of water are needed for one 4-h session with a dialysate flow (Qd) set at 500 mL/min. A lower dialysate flow rate is associated with a significant reduction in the amount of water used. The aim of this study was to check whether change of Qd from 500 mL/min to 300 mL/min has a significant impact on dialysis adequacy. Methods: The study was a retrospective analysis. Due to administrative issues, a satellite dialysis center reduced their dialysate flow to 300 mL/min for a month. The center then increased Qd to 500 mL/min again. We analyzed laboratory data from 3 months before dialysate flow reduction, in the month with Qd reduced to 300 mL/min, and from 3 months thereafter with Qd set at 500 mL/min. Results: Twenty-four people were included in the final analysis. There were no significant changes in urea reduction ratio caused by lower rate of Qd [64.50 (61.75-71.00) vs 67.00 (63.00-72.25) vs 69.00 (63.75-72.25), analysis of variance F(2,46) = 0.71, Conclusion: Reduction in dialysate flow rate to 300 mL/min seems safe and does not cause any short-term negative effects in this small study. Thus, we might be able to achieve a similar therapeutic effect while saving water consumption. Larger, long-term studies incorporating patient-reported outcome measures are needed to confirm the efficacy of this approach.

Indexed as

dialysate flowdialysis adequacygreen nephrologyKt/Vwater

Identifiers

PMID39421239
PMCPMC11483567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.