Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421231›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2024

Inflammation‑based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: Tokushukai REAl‑world Data project 02 (TREAD 02).

Rai Shimoyama, Yoshinori Imamura, Kiyoaki Uryu, Takahiro Mase, Megu Ohtaki, Keiko Ohtani, Megumi Shiragami, Yoshiaki Fujimura, Maki Hayashi, Nobuaki Shinozaki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rai ShimoyamaDepartment of General Surgery, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan.
Yoshinori ImamuraCancer Care Promotion Center, University of Fukui Hospital, Eiheiji, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.
Kiyoaki UryuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yao Tokushukai General Hospital, Yao, Osaka 581-0011, Japan.
Takahiro MaseDepartment of Breast Surgery, Ogaki Tokushukai Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu 503-0015, Japan.
Megu OhtakideCult Co., Ltd., Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima 739-0413, Japan.
Keiko OhtanideCult Co., Ltd., Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima 739-0413, Japan.
Megumi ShiragamiDevelopment Division, Tokushukai Information System Inc., Osaka 530-0001, Japan.
Yoshiaki FujimuraDevelopment Division, Tokushukai Information System Inc., Osaka 530-0001, Japan.
Maki HayashiOncology Project Secretariat, Mirai Iryo Research Center Inc., Tokyo 102-0074, Japan.
Nobuaki ShinozakiDepartment of General Surgery, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa 247-8533, Japan.
Hironobu MinamiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to blood test data, inflammation-based prognostic markers have been used to predict the prognosis of various types of cancer. However, several of these previous studies may be outdated, as they were conducted prior to the widespread adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors, leading to limited reports on their efficacy. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of different inflammation-based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer undergoing nivolumab monotherapy as salvage-line chemotherapy. In a retrospective cohort study across Japan, a total of 159 patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with nivolumab between September 2017 and March 2020 were selected. Blood test data were collected within 14 days of the start of chemotherapy and 17 inflammation-based prognostic markers were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed using all patient background factors. Subsequently, model selection was performed using backward elimination based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to obtain effective background factors which could be assessed for their impact on patient survival. For each marker, the magnitude of the impact on the survival rate, after adjusting for the background factors, was assessed using concordance and AIC analyses. A total of 159 patients (female, 30.2%; median age, 70 years) were included in the present study. Most patients received platinum, fluoropyrimidine and taxane treatment, with a median of three prior lines of systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5-3.8), median overall survival and time to treatment failure were 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-4.5) and 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.3), respectively. Amongst the 17 markers analyzed, the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was classed as the most useful factor that affected the survival rate of patients. Real-world data showed that mGPS, an inflammation-based prognostic marker, had the strongest correlation with prognosis in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer receiving nivolumab monotherapy. The present study was registered as a clinical trial with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) under the trial registration number UMIN000050590 on 15th March 2023.

Indexed as

gastric cancerinflammation-based prognostic markersnivolumabreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID39421231
PMCPMC11484223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.