Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421170›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024

Predictive significance of inflammatory markers in the survival of older Indian patients with cancer: a single-center prospective analysis.

Abhijith Rajaram Rao, Vanita Noronha, Anant Ramaswamy, Anbarasan Sekar, Anita Kumar, Anupa Pillai, Shreya Gattani, Arshiya Sehgal, Sharath Kumar, Renita Castelino and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Abhijith Rajaram RaoDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi 110029, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anant RamaswamyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anbarasan SekarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anita KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anupa PillaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Shreya GattaniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Arshiya SehgalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navai Mumbai 410210, India.
Sharath KumarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navai Mumbai 410210, India.
Renita CastelinoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navai Mumbai 410210, India.
Ratan DhekaleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Jyoti KrishnamurthyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Sarika MahajanDepartment of Physiotherapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Anuradha DaptardarDepartment of Physiotherapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Lekhika SonkusareDepartment of Psycho-oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Jayita DeodharDepartment of Psycho-oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Nabila AnsariDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Manjusha VagalDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Purabi MahajanDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Shivshankar TimmanpyatiDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Manjunath NookalaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navai Mumbai 410210, India.
Ankita ChitreDepartment of Physiotherapy, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Center, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi 221005, India.
Akhil KapoorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahamana Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya Cancer Center, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi 221005, India.
Vikram GotaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navai Mumbai 410210, India.
Shripad BanavaliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.
Rajendra A BadweDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai 400012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) on overall survival (OS) among Indian older patients with cancer. Methods: This observational study was conducted in the geriatric oncology clinic of Tata Memorial Hospital (India). We included all patients who underwent a geriatric assessment (GA) and had a complete blood count available for analysis. The NLR was dichotomized at 3.5, PLR and LMR at the median. Our primary study outcome was OS. Results: Between June 2018 and November 2021, 786 patients were enrolled (median age: 69 years). The most common primary tumour was lung (308, 39.5%), followed by gastrointestinal (261, 33.5%). Metastatic disease was present in 54.3% of patients. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with NLR >3.5 had shorter OS (9.1 months) than NLR <3.5 (15.7 months) (HR: 1.56). Similarly, patients with PLR >183.5 had reduced OS (9.3 months) compared to PLR <183.5 (16.6 months) (HR: 1.56). Conversely, patients with LMR >3.1 showed better OS (14.2) compared to LMR <3.1 (9.8 months) (HR: 0.74). After adjusting for age, performance status, primary tumour, metastatic status and GA-derived factors (function, nutrition and cognition), NLR (HR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.03-1.52), PLR (HR: 1.34, 95%CI: 1.11-1.63) and LMR (HR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.65-0.95) were associated with OS. Conclusion: In our study of older cancer patients, we identified three key inflammatory markers (NLR >3.5, PLR >183.5, LMR <3.1) as strong predictors of poor OS. These markers remain predictive even after accounting for traditional prognostic factors and GA-derived scales.

Indexed as

Indian older adultsinflammatory markersLMRNLRPLRprognostic marker

Identifiers

PMID39421170
PMCPMC11484672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.