ArticleCureus2024
Is It Enough to Diagnose Pheochromocytoma by Measuring Urine Metanephrines Levels?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of plasma and urinary metanephrines and determine their sensitivity, specificity, and correlation among patients with adrenal lesions, which required a multidisciplinary approach because of size, functional state, or malign appearance. This retrospective study of 152 patients with adrenal lesions was conducted at the Outpatient Clinics of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital at the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Diseases between August 2019 and February 2022. These patients were discussed at the Endocrinology and Surgery multidisciplinary council because of their adrenal lesions. Among them, 94 patients underwent adrenal surgery. Thirty patients with histologically proven pheochromocytoma, 36 with cortical nodular hyperplasia, four cases of adrenocortical carcinoma and 24 cases with angiomyolipoma were detected. According to the analysis, the most sensitive test in diagnosing pheochromocytoma was urinary fractionated metanephrine (90%), followed by plasma free metanephrines at 84 %. Conversely, the most specific test was plasma free normetanephrine (91.4%). A statistically significant correlation exists between plasma and urinary metanephrine; plasma normetanephrine levels were also significantly correlated with urine normetanephrine. These findings indicate that plasma and urine metanephrines are sensitive for detecting pheochromocytoma and can be used interchangeably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.