Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421101›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Harvesting Costal Cartilage for Secondary Rhinoplasty: Techniques, Considerations, and Outcomes.

Mohammed A Bagunaid, Mohammed A Borah, Abdullah M Abualjoud, Farss S Hariri, Hammad Nasir, Ka'ab M Ibrahim, Ali O Bajunaid, Eatedal M Al-Shareef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed A BagunaidMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Mohammed A BorahMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullah M AbualjoudMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Farss S HaririMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Hammad NasirMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Ka'ab M IbrahimMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Ali O BajunaidDermatology, JC Clinics, Jeddah, SAU.
Eatedal M Al-ShareefMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary rhinoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at reshaping the nose after the unsatisfactory results of primary rhinoplasty, which usually requires a reliable source of cartilage for grafting. Septal cartilage is usually the first option for rhinoplasty, but in cases where it is insufficient, rib cartilage might be used, which is the focus of the current study. The article details the surgical techniques for rib cartilage harvesting, highlighting the preference for the seventh rib done under general anaesthesia. The surgery requires a precise incision, harvesting of the cartilage, and careful closure while the cartilage is stored in a saline solution until use. It also introduces innovative approaches to minimize complications and improve patient satisfaction, including trans-umbilical endoscopic harvesting, the use of the 10th rib to reduce morbidity, and employing fresh frozen homologous rib cartilage as a grafting alternative. Based on various studies, most cases following rhinoplasty with rib cartilage showed a high satisfaction rate despite the complexity of the procedure. Patient consideration includes good communication with realistic expectations through imaging techniques. We also discuss complications, which can heavily impact the patient's quality of life. We hope that by providing this information, our paper will provide surgeons and researchers with the latest information on this topic.

Indexed as

cartilage graftingpatient satisfactionrib cartilagesecondary rhinoplastysurgical techniques

Identifiers

PMID39421101
PMCPMC11486523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.