ArticleCureus2024
Correlation of Endoscopic and Histopathological Diagnoses in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Histopathological Lesions and Their Correlation With Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings: A Retrospective Study at a District Hospital in Ghana.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Histopathological and Clinicopathological Correlation of Endoscopic Biopsies of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) endoscopy with biopsy is essential for diagnosing and managing various GIT diseases, including malignancies and inflammatory conditions. This study aimed to analyze the spectrum of histopathological lesions in the GIT and their correlation with the endoscopic findings. Methodology This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary medical college involving 114 patients who underwent GIT endoscopy between June 2023 and June 2024. This study focused on lesion types across different GIT sites (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) and the agreement between endoscopic and histological diagnoses. Results Lesions were most prevalent in the stomach (52.6% of cases, n=60), followed by the duodenum (35.1%, n=40) and esophagus (12.3%, n=14). Significant correlations were found between endoscopic and histological diagnoses in the esophagus (concordance for esophagitis was 100%) and stomach (concordance for gastritis was 95%). In the duodenum, the concordance was high for duodenitis (100%) but lower for other lesions such as neuroendocrine tumors (71.43%). However, Cohen's kappa values indicated poor overall agreement across all sites (κ=0.49), reflecting variability in diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion This study highlights the reliability of endoscopic procedures for diagnosing upper GIT lesions, particularly in the esophagus and stomach, while emphasizing the challenges in diagnosing duodenal lesions. These findings support the need for targeted screening and further research to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in GIT diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.