Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39421009›Full record

ArticleBioscience2024

Fish habitat models for a future of novel riverscapes.

Henry H Hansen, Claudio Comoglio, Jelger Elings, Philip Ericsson, Peter Goethals, Marie-Pierre Gosselin, Franz Hölker, Christos Katopodis, Paul Kemp, Lovisa Lind and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Henry H HansenDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-2875
Claudio ComoglioPolitecnico di Torino, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.
Jelger ElingsDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Philip EricssonFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom.
Peter GoethalsDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie-Pierre GosselinNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
Franz HölkerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries in the Department of Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Forschungsverbund Berlin eV, Berlin, Germany.
Christos KatopodisKatopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Paul KempFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom.
Lovisa LindDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Rachel MawerDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Gloria MozziDepartment of Environment, Land, and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Piemonte, Italy.
John M NestlerIndependent consultant in Edwards, Mississippi, United States.
John PiccoloDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences at Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Johannes RadingerLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SchneiderSJE Ecohydraulic Engineering GmbH, in Stuttgart, Germany.
Velizara StoilovaDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences at Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Bernhard WegscheiderInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Zürich, Switzerland.
Eva BergmanDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences at Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple anthropogenic forces have pushed river ecosystems into undesirable states with no clear understanding of how they should be best managed. The advancement of riverine fish habitat models intended to provide management insights has slowed. Investigations into theoretical and empirical gaps to define habitat more comprehensively across different scales and ecological organizations are crucial in managing the freshwater biodiversity crisis. We introduce the concept of novel riverscapes to reconcile anthropogenic forcing, fish habitat, limitations of current fish habitat models, and opportunities for new models. We outline three priority data-driven opportunities that incorporate the novel riverscape concept: fish movement, river behavior, and drivers of novelty that all are integrated into a scale-based framework to guide the development of new models. Last, we present a case study showing how researchers, model developers, and practitioners can work collaboratively to implement the novel riverscape concept.

Indexed as

novel ecosystemsriverine processesriver managementspatial scalestemporal scales

Identifiers

PMID39421009
PMCPMC11480667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.