ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Human sensory-like neuron cultivation-An optimized protocol.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid generation of human sensory neurons from iPSC for modeling of peripheral neuropathies.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reprogramming of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their differentiation into specific cell types, such as induced sensory-like neurons (iSNs), are critical for disease modeling and drug testing. However, the variability of cell populations challenges reliability and reproducibility. While various protocols for iSN differentiation exist, the development of non-iSN cells in these cultures remains an issue. Therefore, standardization of protocols is essential. This study aimed to improve iSN culture conditions by reducing the number of non-iSN cells while preserving the survival and quality of iSNs. Methods: iSNs were differentiated from a healthy control iPSC line using an established protocol. Interventions for protocol optimization included floxuridine (FdU) or 1-β-D-arabinofuranosyl-cytosine hydrochloride (AraC) treatment, magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), early cell passaging, and replating. Cell viability and iSN-to-total-cell-count ratio were assessed using a luminescent assay and immunocytochemistry, respectively. Results: Passaging of cells during differentiation did not increase the iSN-to-total-cell-count ratio, and MACS of immature iSNs led to neuronal blebbing and reduced the iSN-to-total-cell-count ratio. Treatment with high concentrations and prolonged incubation of FdU or AraC resulted in excessive cell death. However, treatment with 10 μM FdU for 24 h post-differentiation showed the most selective targeting of non-iSN cells, leading to an increase in the iSN-to-total-cell count ratio without compromising the viability or functionality of the iSN population. Replating of iSNs shortly after seeding also helped to reduce non-iSN cells. Conclusion: In direct comparison with other methods, treatment with 10 μM FdU for 24 h after differentiation shows promise for improving iSN culture purity, which could benefit downstream applications in disease modeling and drug discovery. However, further investigations involving multiple iPSC lines and optimization of protocol parameters are warranted to fully exploit the potential of this method and enhance its reproducibility and applicability. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into optimizing culture conditions for iSN differentiation and highlights the importance of standardized protocols in iPSC-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.