Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420975›Full record

ReviewCardiology research2024

Diverse Concepts in Definitions of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Theory and Practice.

Michael C Myers, Boris Breznen, Yue Zhong, Sonomi Maruyama, Cindy Bueno, Arnaud Bastien, Mir Sohail Fazeli, Negar Golchin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07536880 (Effect of Sildenafil on Left Ventricular Function in Pediatric Patients With Primary Dilated Cardiomyopathy Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07536880 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Sildenafil on Left Ventricular Function in Pediatric Patients With Primary Dilated Cardiomyopathy Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsCardiomyopathy, Dilated
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael C MyersBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Boris BreznenEvidinno Outcomes Research Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Yue ZhongBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sonomi MaruyamaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Cindy BuenoBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Arnaud BastienBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mir Sohail FazeliEvidinno Outcomes Research Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Negar GolchinBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is evolving as new insights into the underlying pathophysiology become available. Professional organizations and clinical experts are improving definitions of DCM, allowing for more accurate treatment recommendations. This review summarized key published literature describing definitions and/or diagnostic criteria for DCM. Embase was searched from database inception to September 19, 2022 for 1) publications reporting definitions of DCM by major professional organizations and related opinion papers, and 2) clinical studies in DCM and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Sixty-eight records were included in this review. Definitions of DCM provided by two major professional organizations (American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC)) agreed on the clinical presentation of DCM; however, they differed in the classification of DCM within the larger context of cardiomyopathy taxonomies. Both organizations agreed that DCM could be clinically defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and contractile dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions and severe coronary artery disease. AHA guidelines divided cardiomyopathies into two major groups (primary and secondary) based on predominant organ involvement. DCM was classified as primary cardiomyopathy with mixed (genetic and/or acquired) etiology. Conversely, ESC published a clinically oriented taxonomy in which cardiomyopathies were grouped into specific morphological and functional phenotypes; each was subclassified into familial or non-familial forms. Opinion papers further elaborated on the complex interplay between genetics and environment in the etiology of DCM. Several articles summarized the importance of the new and updated diagnostic tools, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, electrocardiogram, and other biomarkers, in correctly identifying the etiology of DCM. Within clinical studies, most inclusion criteria used standard definitions proposed by leading professional associations (AHA and ESC). Clinical study investigators sometimes used a narrower definition of DCM using additional criteria for the left ventricular ejection fraction threshold value and left ventricular dilatation. Current efforts in cardiology research are focused on a more granular understanding of DCM etiology and the natural history of the disease. Definitions of DCM found in clinical studies mainly rely on published guidelines, with some studies adding idiosyncratic inclusion criteria refining the broad definitions of DCM.

Indexed as

CardiologyDilated cardiomyopathyGenetic dilated cardiomyopathyHeart failureIdiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID39420975
PMCPMC11483116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.