ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024
Comorbidity and adverse events in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Factor Therapies in Haemophilia: The Era of Factor VIII Mimetics and Targeted Rebalancing Agents.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Acquired hemophilia A: an illustrated review based on the French National Guidelines.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Thrombin generation to predict breakthrough bleeding in patients with acquired hemophilia A under emicizumab prophylaxis.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Remarkable Prolongation of Irreversible APTT and Non-Significant Hemorrhage: A Rare High Titer of FVIII Inhibitor Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Review
- Management of Breakthrough Bleeding During Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Acquired Haemophilia A: Data From the GTH-AHA-EMI Study.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persons with acquired hemophilia A are often older and suffer from comorbidity or frailty. Little is known about the impact on clinically relevant outcomes of acquired hemophilia A. Objectives: To assess the relevance of age, physical performance status, comorbidity, and concomitant medication on the risk of bleeding and other outcomes. Methods: Post hoc analysis of data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study that used emicizumab for bleed protection and withheld immunosuppressive treatment during the early phase of management. Primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant new bleeding (CRNB) during the first 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis. Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years; performance status (World Health Organization performance status [WHO-PS]) was 3 or worse in 41%; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 5 or higher in 63%; antithrombotic drugs were reported in 34%. Rate of CRNB during 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis was similar across subgroups of age, sex, WHO-PS, CCI, baseline factor VIII activity, and inhibitor titer. Patients with CRNB during the study had more severe anemia already at baseline. However, persistent severe anemia in week 4 was not related to risk of bleeding beyond this time. CRNB was associated with injury from falling in 7 of 14 patients. Adverse events grade 3 or higher were not related to baseline CCI or age but were more frequent in patients with poor WHO-PS. Conclusion: Emicizumab provided bleed protection regardless of age and comorbidity. Clinical baseline characteristics did not predict breakthrough bleeding under emicizumab. Poor WHO-PS at baseline was associated with severe adverse events during the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.