Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420917›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2024

Optimal treatment targets for lupus nephritis using per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy findings at 2 years and clinical data up to 5 years: a single-center observational study.

Hidetoshi Kagawa, Ryutaro Yamanaka, Ai Matsubara, Tatsuyuki Inoue, Reika Hayashi, Natsuki Kubota, Tsutomu Hiromasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hidetoshi KagawaDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, 1-12-1 Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8540, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-8680
Ryutaro YamanakaDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Ai MatsubaraDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Tatsuyuki InoueDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Reika HayashiDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Natsuki KubotaDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.
Tsutomu HiromasaDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The criteria for remission in both clinical and pathological contexts for lupus nephritis (LN) remain controversial. Objectives: To identify optimal short-term goals (remission criteria) for LN predicting long-term success at 5 years, using repeat kidney biopsy (Biopsy 2) and clinical data. Design: Single-center observational study. Methods: Twenty-three consecutive LN patients undergoing Biopsy 2 2 years post-induction therapy were evaluated. Two ideal long-term goals at 5 years were defined as: "A," Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0 and prednisolone (PSL) ⩽5 mg/day, and "B," proteinuria ⩽0.2 g/day with a normal serum creatinine level and PSL ⩽5 mg/day. Histologically, the electron-dense deposit (EDD) score grades immune deposits based on their intensity, amount, and location. A score of ⩽1 was defined as "electron microscopy remission (ER)." Results: Conventional renal indices failed to predict long-term goals. The short-term goals with an accuracy (area under the curve: 95% confidence interval) of ⩾0.8 predicted long-term goals: "A at 5 years" (A-5y), A-2y (0.91: 0.79-1.00), DORIS-R-2y (0.87: 0.72-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.70-1.00), B-2y (0.83: 0.66-0.99), and SLEDAI-R-2y (0.82: 0.66-0.98) as well as "B at 5 years" (B-5y), A-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), B-2y (0.87: 0.73-1.00), EDD score (0.85: 0.69-1.00), and DORIS-R-2y (0.83: 0.67-0.99). EDD scores predicted A-5y, B-5y, and PSL dose at 5 years in proportion to the score. The clinical and histological goals aligned. Conclusion: The best predictive short-term goal was A-2y. Concordance between clinical remission (A-2y, B-2y, and DORIS-R-2y) and histological remission (ER) at 2 years suggests optimal short-term goals for LN.

Indexed as

electron microscopylong-term goalslupus nephritisper-protocol repeat kidney biopsyremission criteriashort-term goals

Identifiers

PMID39420917
PMCPMC11483839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.