ArticleACS chemical biology2024
AlphaFold Ensemble Competition Screens Enable Peptide Binder Design with Single-Residue Sensitivity.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- De Novo-Designed Bifunctional Proteins for Targeted Protein Degradation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Predicting the protein interaction landscape of a free-living bacterium with pooled-AlphaFold3.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Combinatorial protein barcodes enable self-correcting neuron tracing with nanoscale molecular context.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Engineering Peptide Modulators for T-Cell Migration by Structural Scaffold Matching.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between the sequence and binding energy in peptide-protein interactions is an important challenge in chemical biology. A prominent example is ubiquitin interacting motifs (UIMs), which are short peptide sequences that recognize ubiquitin and which bind individual ubiquitin proteins with a weak affinity. Though the sequence characteristics of UIMs are well understood, the relationship between the sequence and ubiquitin binding affinity has not yet been fully characterized. Herein, we study the first UIM of Vps27 as a model system. Using an experimental alanine scan, we were able to rank the relative contribution of each hydrophobic residue of this UIM to ubiquitin binding. These results were correlated with AlphaFold displacement studies, in which AlphaFold is used to predict the stronger binder by presenting a target protein with two potential peptide ligands. We demonstrate that by generating large numbers of models and using the consensus bound-state AlphaFold competition experiments can be sensitive to single-residue variations. We furthermore show that to fully recapitulate the binding trends observed for ubiquitin, it is necessary to screen AlphaFold models that incorporate a "decoy" binding site to prevent the displaced peptide from interfering with the actual binding site. Overall, it is shown that AlphaFold can be used as a powerful tool for peptide binder design and that when large ensembles of models are used, AlphaFold predictions can be sensitive to very small energetic changes arising from single-residue alterations to a binder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.