ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
Artificial Intelligence Application for Anti-tumor Drug Synergy Prediction.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MTDH inhibits CrAT to promote mitochondrial damage in palmitic acid-induced renal tubular cells.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Mechanistic Cancer Target Discovery and Drug Development: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The role of agentic artificial intelligence in healthcare: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Rethinking Nature's Pharmacy: AI Era and Natural Product Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in cancer epigenomics: a review on advances in pan-cancer detection and precision medicine.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Review
- Improving synergistic drug combination prediction with signature-based gene expression features in oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Prospects and challenges of deep learning in gynecologic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the main therapeutic methods for cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy still plays an important role in tumor therapy. Due to the variety of pathogenic factors, the development process of tumors is complex and regulated by many factors, and the treatment of a single drug is easy to cause the human body to produce a drug-resistant phenotype to specific drugs and eventually leads to treatment failure. In the process of clinical tumor treatment, the combination of multiple drugs can produce stronger anti-tumor effects by regulating multiple mechanisms and can reduce the problem of tumor drug resistance while reducing the toxic side effects of drugs. Therefore, it is still a great challenge to construct an efficient and accurate screening method that can systematically consider the synergistic anti- tumor effects of multiple drugs. However, anti-tumor drug synergy prediction is of importance in improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective drug combinations remains a complex and challenging task. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cancer drug synergy therapy and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in cancer drug synergy prediction. In addition, we discuss the challenges and perspectives associated with deep learning approaches. In conclusion, the review of the AI techniques' application in cancer drug synergy prediction can further advance our understanding of cancer drug synergy and provide more effective treatment plans and reasonable drug use strategies for clinical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39420717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.