ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Serum Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio Predicts One-Year Mortality in Elderly Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective Cohort Analysis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Preoperative Serum Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio Predicts 1-Year Reintervention After Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of serum high creatinine-to-albumin ratio with increased 1-year mortality in older patients following hip fracture surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Association of serum albumin to creatinine ratio with mortality in patients with aortic disease: a cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Serum Albumin-Creatinine Ratio and Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) has been suggested as a valuable biomarker for adverse events in acute myocardial infarction. However, the prognostic value of ACR in very elderly patients (≥80 years) with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 354 very elderly patients with NSTE-ACS who underwent PCI were included in this study and followed up for 1 year. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to ACR tertiles. Logistic regression analysis proportional hazard model was used to determine the prognostic value of ACR. RESULTS Sixty-two patients (17.5%) with 114 major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were recorded during 1-year follow-up. Patients with lower ACR tended to be older and had a lower serum albumin level and higher uric acid and creatinine levels (P<0.05). Moreover, patients with lower ACR levels had elevated all-cause mortality and MACCEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that patients with a lower ACR had a significantly lower survival rate free of all-cause mortality and MACCEs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ACR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in these patients. ROC analysis showed that when ACR was ≤42.8, sensitivity and specificity were 75.2% and 80.2%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.745-0.859; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS A lower ACR was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality in very elderly patients with NSTE-ACS after PCI. The ACR is a promising indicator for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.