Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420438›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2024

Design and development of a machine-learning-driven opioid overdose risk prediction tool integrated in electronic health records in primary care settings.

Khoa Nguyen, Debbie L Wilson, Julie Diiulio, Bradley Hall, Laura Militello, Walid F Gellad, Christopher A Harle, Motomori Lewis, Siegfried Schmidt, Eric I Rosenberg and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06806163 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Machine-Learning Prediction and Reducing Overdoses With EHR Nudges

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,350ConditionsOpioid Overdose, Opioid Use, Opioid Use Disorder, OpioidsArmsEHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag, EHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag with Behavioral Nudges, Usual Care
NCT06810076 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Evaluating a Machine-Learning Opioid Prediction & Risk-Stratification E-Platform (DEMONSTRATE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2026Enrolled674ConditionsOpiate Overdose, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotic-Related Disorders, Substance-related DisordersArmsMachine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support: Overdose Prevention Alert (OPA) Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Khoa Nguyen *Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Debbie L Wilson *Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Julie DiiulioApplied Decision Science, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Bradley HallDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Laura MilitelloApplied Decision Science, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Walid F GelladDivision of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christopher A HarleDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Motomori LewisDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Siegfried SchmidtDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eric I RosenbergDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Danielle NelsonDepartment of Community Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Xing HeHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Yonghui WuHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jiang BianHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stephanie A S StarasHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Adam J GordonDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jerry CochranDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Courtney KuzaDivision of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Seonkyeong YangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Weihsuan Lo-CiganicDivision of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jenny.lociganic@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrating advanced machine-learning (ML) algorithms into clinical practice is challenging and requires interdisciplinary collaboration to develop transparent, interpretable, and ethically sound clinical decision support (CDS) tools. We aimed to design a ML-driven CDS tool to predict opioid overdose risk and gather feedback for its integration into the University of Florida Health (UFHealth) electronic health record (EHR) system.

methodsWe used user-centered design methods to integrate the ML algorithm into the EHR system. The backend and UI design sub-teams collaborated closely, both informed by user feedback sessions. We conducted seven user feedback sessions with five UF Health primary care physicians (PCPs) to explore aspects of CDS tools, including workflow, risk display, and risk mitigation strategies. After customizing the tool based on PCPs' feedback, we held two rounds of one-on-one usability testing sessions with 8 additional PCPs to gather feedback on prototype alerts. These sessions informed iterative UI design and backend processes, including alert frequency and reappearance circumstances.

resultsThe backend process development identified needs and requirements from our team, information technology, UFHealth, and PCPs. Thirteen PCPs (male = 62%, White = 85%) participated across 7 user feedback sessions and 8 usability testing sessions. During the user feedback sessions, PCPs (n = 5) identified flaws such as the term "high risk" of overdose potentially leading to unintended consequences (e.g., immediate addiction services referrals), offered suggestions, and expressed trust in the tool. In the first usability testing session, PCPs (n = 4) emphasized the need for natural risk presentation (e.g., 1 in 200) and suggested displaying the alert multiple times yearly for at-risk patients. Another 4 PCPs in the second usability testing session valued the UFHealth-specific alert for managing new or unfamiliar patients, expressed concerns about PCPs' workload when prescribing to high-risk patients, and recommended incorporating the details page into training sessions to enhance usability.

conclusionsThe final backend process for our CDS alert aligns with PCP needs and UFHealth standards. Integrating feedback from PCPs in the early development phase of our ML-driven CDS tool helped identify barriers and facilitators in the CDS integration process. This collaborative approach yielded a refined prototype aimed at minimizing unintended consequences and enhancing usability.

Indexed as

Clinical decision supportMachine learningUser-centered design approach

Identifiers

PMID39420438
PMCPMC11488086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.