Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420422›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2024

How can equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles be incorporated into research excellence with industry and community partners? Lessons learned from Canada and Australia on projects with a dementia focus.

Lillian Hung, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Tshepo Rasekaba, Lily Haopu Ren, Dan Douglass, Sandra Slatter, Annette Berndt, Irene Blackberry

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lillian HungIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, T201-2211, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Karen Lok Yi WongIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, T201-2211, V6T 2B5, Canada. klywong1@mail.ubc.ca.
Tshepo RasekabaCare Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, PO Box 821, Melbourne, Wodonga, VIC, VIC, 3086, 3689, Australia.
Lily Haopu RenIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, T201-2211, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Dan DouglassHEATHCOTE Health, 39 Hospital Street, Heathcote, VIC, 3523, Australia.
Sandra SlatterHEATHCOTE Dementia Alliance, 39 Hospital Street, Heathcote, VIC, 3523, Australia.
Annette BerndtIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, T201-2211, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Irene BlackberryCare Economy Research Institute, La Trobe University, PO Box 821, Melbourne, Wodonga, VIC, VIC, 3086, 3689, Australia.

Funding

La Trobe UniversitAustralian Government, Department of Health, Dementia and Aged Care Services (DACS) 4-4Z3E23HMitacs IT27862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid advancement of gerontechnology, technologies for older adults, needs a collaboration that integrates the efforts of researchers, industry and community partners. Multisector collaboration fosters a holistic view of technologies, merging industry expertise, academic rigour, and the lived experiences of older adults and caregivers. This paper explores the role of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) perspectives in Patient and Public Involvement (PPI).

methodsWe present two case studies from Canada and Australia. Study One involves a dementia television project, and Study Two is an innovative rural dementia care project. Data sources included transcripts of the case studies' focus groups, research meeting notes, and associated study publications between 2021 and 2023 and 2016-2024, respectively. Utilizing Rolfe's reflective model, we reflected on lessons learned regarding challenges, strategies, and their implications for future research. Our analysis focused on two questions: (1) What were the common challenges of partnering with industry and PPI in the research process? And (2) How can EDI be applied to help overcome those challenges?

resultsThematic analysis identified five common themes of challenges and ten practical strategies. The challenges are (1) experiential bias, (2) underrepresentation, (3) communication gaps, (4) mistrust and (5) power dynamics. Based on the lessons learned, we identified ten practical strategies using EDI principles: (1) seek diverse representation, (2) establish transparent agreements, (3) adopt inclusive language and cultural sensitivity, (4) apply flexibility to learn and adapt, (5) embed team reflection (6) take time to build trust and relationships, (7) facilitate meaningful engagement, (8) provide equitable recognition and opportunity, (9) foster a respectful environment for knowledge transfer, and (10) cultivate a long-term sustained relationship.

conclusionThe older population is diverse, and their needs are complex. EDI considerations contribute to fostering research excellence and maximizing the potential of PPI to develop technologies to improve aging experiences that truly meet the diverse needs of older adults for societal impact. Multisector collaboration requires clear communication and intentional efforts to build trust. EDI considerations should be embedded at every stage of the research process. This paper outlines common challenges, strategies, and implications as practical tips for future research and practice.

Indexed as

Community partnersDiversityEDIEquityInclusionIndustry partners

Identifiers

PMID39420422
PMCPMC11484242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.