Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420413›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2025

Patient and carer feedback and engagement with ECHOMANTRA, a digital guided intervention for anorexia nervosa.

Valentina Cardi, Katie Rowlands, Suman Ambwani, Pamela Macdonald, Jon Arcelus, Ulrike Schmidt, Janet Treasure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  2. Patient and carer feedback and engagement with ECHOMANTRA, a digital guided intervention for anorexia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentina CardiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7763-7099
Katie RowlandsDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-4344
Suman AmbwaniDIS Study Abroad in Scandinavia, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pamela MacdonaldDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jon ArcelusInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Janet TreasureDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0871-4596

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe developed ECHOMANTRA, a digital guided intervention for patients with anorexia nervosa and their carers to provide support during transition from inpatient care to community settings. This study reports on participants' engagement with, and feedback of, ECHOMANTRA.

methodPatients and carers (N = 184 dyads) were given access to ECHOMANTRA for 12 months. The intervention included online groups, a workbook and recovery-oriented videoclips. Satisfactory engagement was defined as attendance of a minimum of four online groups by each dyad. Participants received an Intervention Feedback Form to measure frequency of use and provide feedback of the intervention. Those who did not meet the engagement criterion were asked to complete an Obstacles to Engagement Form.

results19% of the sample reached the engagement criterion. Seventy-six patients and 60 carers completed the Intervention Feedback Form. Of those, approximately 60% reported using at least a quarter of the workbook and videoclips. Overall, participants found the materials useful and easy to access (median = 3 on a scale 1-5). Obstacles to engagement (35 patients and 14 carers) included lack of time due to caring responsibilities, treatment, work/school commitments.

conclusionA more personalised form of support may be needed to enhance motivation and ability to change following inpatient care.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaCaregiversAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultcarerseating disordersinpatientonlineself‐management

Identifiers

PMID39420413
PMCPMC11786927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.