Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420411›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

Multimodal deep learning radiomics model for predicting postoperative progression in solid stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Qionglian Kuang, Bao Feng, Kuncai Xu, Yehang Chen, Xiaojuan Chen, Xiaobei Duan, Xiaoyan Lei, Xiangmeng Chen, Kunwei Li, Wansheng Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qionglian Kuang *Department of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital, 19#, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, Hainan Province, 570311, PR China.
Bao Feng *Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence of Biomedicine, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin City, Guangxi Province, 541004, China.
Kuncai XuLaboratory of Artificial Intelligence of Biomedicine, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin City, Guangxi Province, 541004, China.
Yehang ChenLaboratory of Artificial Intelligence of Biomedicine, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin City, Guangxi Province, 541004, China.
Xiaojuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, 23#, North Road, Pengjiang Zone, Jiangmen, Guangdong Province, 529030, PR China.
Xiaobei DuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong Province, 529030, PR China.
Xiaoyan LeiDepartment of Radiology, Hainan General Hospital, 19#, Xiuhua Road, Xiuying District, Haikou, Hainan Province, 570311, PR China.
Xiangmeng ChenDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, 23#, North Road, Pengjiang Zone, Jiangmen, Guangdong Province, 529030, PR China. 181970902@qq.com.
Kunwei LiDepartment of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, 519000, PR China. likunwei@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Wansheng LongDepartment of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, 23#, North Road, Pengjiang Zone, Jiangmen, Guangdong Province, 529030, PR China. jmlws2@163.com.

Funding

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation B2022113National Natural Science Foundation of China 6217604National Natural Science Foundation of China 81960324Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2021GXNSFAA075037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the application value of a multimodal deep learning radiomics (MDLR) model in predicting the risk status of postoperative progression in solid stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 459 patients with histologically confirmed solid stage I NSCLC who underwent surgical resection in our institution from January 2014 to September 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. At another medical center, 104 patients were reviewed as an external validation cohort according to the same criteria. A univariate analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological characteristics and subjective CT findings of the progression and non-progression groups. The clinicopathological characteristics and subjective CT findings that exhibited significant differences were used as input variables for the extreme learning machine (ELM) classifier to construct the clinical model. We used the transfer learning strategy to train the ResNet18 model, used the model to extract deep learning features from all CT images, and then used the ELM classifier to classify the deep learning features to obtain the deep learning signature (DLS). A MDLR model incorporating clinicopathological characteristics, subjective CT findings and DLS was constructed. The diagnostic efficiencies of the clinical model, DLS model and MDLR model were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsUnivariate analysis indicated that size (p = 0.004), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) (p = 0.03), carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA199) (p = 0.003), and pathological stage (p = 0.027) were significantly associated with the progression of solid stage I NSCLC after surgery. Therefore, these clinical characteristics were incorporated into the clinical model to predict the risk of progression in postoperative solid-stage NSCLC patients. A total of 294 deep learning features with nonzero coefficients were selected. The DLS in the progressive group was (0.721 ± 0.371), which was higher than that in the nonprogressive group (0.113 ± 0.350) (p < 0.001). The combination of size、NSE、CA199、pathological stage and DLS demonstrated the superior performance in differentiating postoperative progression status. The AUC of the MDLR model was 0.885 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.842-0.927), higher than that of the clinical model (0.675 (95% CI: 0.599-0.752)) and DLS model (0.882 (95% CI: 0.835-0.929)). The DeLong test and decision in curve analysis revealed that the MDLR model was the most predictive and clinically useful model.

conclusionMDLR model is effective in predicting the risk of postoperative progression of solid stage I NSCLC, and it is helpful for the treatment and follow-up of solid stage I NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningDisease ProgressionLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesComputed tomographyDeep learningNon-small cell lung cancerPostoperative progressRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39420411
PMCPMC11487701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.