Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420324›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Comparison of chronotype and learning motivation in medical university students.

Maki Sato, Magdalena Roszak, Takahiro Hashimoto, Barbara Kołodziejczak, Denis Gubin, Neil Boudville, Edyta Kawka, Andrzej Bręborowicz, Janusz Witowski, Dominika Kanikowska

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maki SatoInstitutional Research, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan. msato@aichi-med-u.ac.jp.
Magdalena RoszakDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Takahiro HashimotoMathematics, Basic Sciences, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Barbara KołodziejczakDepartment of Mathematics, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Denis GubinDepartment of Biology, Tyumen Medical University, Tyumen, Russia.
Neil BoudvilleThe University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Edyta KawkaDepartment of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Andrzej BręborowiczDepartment of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Janusz WitowskiDepartment of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Dominika KanikowskaDepartment of Pathophysiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

Funding

Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science Overseas Joint Research Support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople differ in their preferred time for intellectual activities. Morningness-eveningness preferences describe the preferred time for performing daily activities and are determined by chronotype. Chronotype reflects circadian preference in humans and is divided into morning, intermediate, and evening types. Learning motivation is a key predictor of student success and may influence learning and study, academic performance, intention to continue medical research, and well-being. Helping students develop learning motivation may improve their educational achievement and health. There are opposing studies regarding chronotype and academic achievement. We hypothesized that chronotype affects the learning motivation of medical school students.

methodsWe used the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ), and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Russian, Polish, Japanese, and Australian students in the first and second years of medical university. A total of 540 medical students answered the questionnaires. The MSLQ contains six subscales: intrinsic goal orientation, extrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, control of learning beliefs, task value, and test anxiety.

resultsThe rMEQ was used to classify the students into three types, which were morning (26.7%), intermediate (60.5%), or evening chronotypes (12.7%) based on their scores. The learning motivation scores for the intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations, task value, and self-efficacy were lower in evening chronotypes.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the evening chronotype had a lower learning motivation than the morning chronotype. Evening-oriented students may need a more flexible schedule, and a shift of the most important courses in the university to the afternoon may help them to attain higher motivation for learning medicine.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmLearningMotivationStudents, MedicalAdultAustraliaChronotypeFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChronotypeLearning motivationMedical students

Identifiers

PMID39420324
PMCPMC11487975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.