Observational studyBMC health services research2024
Benefits of emergency department routine blood test performance on patients whose allocated triage category is not time critical: a retrospective study.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altitude-Related Laboratory Changes and a Novel Hemoglobin Estimation Model: A Retrospective Analysis in Children and Adults.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Co-Design of a Theory-Informed, Multicomponent, Intervention for Diagnostic Stewardship in a Major-Referral Emergency Department: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- A qualitative study of emergency physicians' perspective on the emergency journey of older patients.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- High- and Low-Complexity Features of Non-Critical Adult Patients in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Phlebotomists on Emergency Department Performance: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
- A machine learning-based model for assessing community-acquired pneumonia severity using routine blood tests.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency department clinicians, and particularly nurses in triage, frequently perform routine blood tests on patients whose allocated triage category is not time critical (triage categories 3, 4 and 5 of the Australasian Triage Scale). Some observers have questioned the utility of routine blood testing in these acute healthcare settings given the cost and workload implications.
methodsA quantitative method using retrospective observational design was utilised guided by STROBE checklist. Electronic medical records of patient data collected at a quaternary Australian metropolitan hospital emergency department were reviewed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 74,878 adult patients attended the emergency department between 1st January and 31st December 2021 and a sample of 383 were randomly allocated for this study. Of the 383 patients included, 51% were female, age ranges were 18-99 years (mean 51.6). The majority were Australasian Triage scale (ATS) triage category 3 (55%) and 62% had blood tests performed. Blood test performance was found to be associated with advancing age (p < 0.001) but not with department occupancy as determined by the national emergency department overcrowding scale (p = 0.230).
conclusionBlood testing in the emergency department in triaged non-time critical patients was found to be frequent thereby affecting nurses' already stretched time resource. Older patients were found to be more likely to have a blood test. There is a positive correlation between blood test performance and length of stay in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.