Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420260›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024

Agreement between a new fully automatic ocular biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry and an optical biometer based on Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry.

Rui Ning, Huilin Xu, Zheng Li, Jinjin Yu, Shuoyu Xu, Chak Seng Lei, Yiran Wang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rui Ning *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Huilin Xu *Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zheng Li *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jinjin YuNingbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Shuoyu XuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Chak Seng LeiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yiran WangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Giacomo SaviniG.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S, Rome, Italy.
Domenico Schiano-LomorielloG.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S, Rome, Italy.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China. xingtaozhou@fudan.edu.cn.
Jinhai HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China. vip999vip@163.com.

Funding

EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University High-level Talents Program 2021318Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning TP2022046Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271048Shanghai Science and Technology 22S11900200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo analyze the difference and agreement between measurements obtained by a new fully automatic optical biometer, the SW-9000 μm Plus, based on optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and a commonly used optical biometer (Pentacam AXL) based on Scheimpflug imaging with partial coherence interferometry (PCI).

methodsThe central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD, from epithelium to anterior lens surface), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (K

resultsStatistically significant differences were detected for all parameters but J

conclusionsThe measurements of AL, CCT, ACD, K

Indexed as

BiometryCorneaInterferometryAdultAgedAnterior ChamberAxial Length, EyeFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLens, CrystallineMaleMiddle AgedPhotographyPupilReproducibility of ResultsBiometryOptical low coherence reflectometryPartial coherence interferometryScheimpflug Imaging

Identifiers

PMID39420260
PMCPMC11484231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.