ReviewInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2025
How and why to follow best practices for testing mediation models with missing data.
Review in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Class Discrimination and Academic Success: A Person-Centered Approach Among Adolescents Disadvantaged in Social Class.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
- Article
- The Moderating Role of Social Functioning in the Relationship Between Stigma and Quality of Life in Rural Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Acceptance of Innovative Food Among Tourists: Psychological Factors and Generational Differences in the Post-Transition Context of Serbia.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- BMI partially mediates the association between the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and depression in obese adults.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Eating Disorder Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis: Relationships Between Neuroticism, Body Dissatisfaction, and Self-Esteem.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mediation models are often conducted in psychology to understand mechanisms and processes of change. However, current best practices for handling missing data in mediation models are not always used by researchers. Missing data methods, such as full information maximum likelihood (FIML) and multiple imputation (MI), are best practice methods of handling missing data. However, FIML or MI are rarely used to handle missing data when testing mediation models, instead analyses used listwise deletion methods, the default in popular software. Compared to listwise deletion, the implementation of FIML or MI to handle missing data reduces parameter estimate bias, while maintaining the sample collected to maximise power and generalizability of results. In this tutorial, we review how to implement full-information maximum likelihood and MI using best practice methods of testing the indirect effect. We demonstrate how to implement these methods using both R and JASP, which are both free, open-source software programmes and provide online supplemental materials for these demonstrations. These methods are demonstrated using two example analyses, one using a cross-sectional mediation model and one using a longitudinal mediation model examining how student-athletes reported worry about COVID predicts their perceived stress, which in turn predicts satisfaction with life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.