ReviewNature food2024
The full picture of people's realities must be considered to deliver better diets for all.
Review in Nature food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Challenges and Solutions to Adopting Healthy Diets Among Women and Children: A Photovoice Study in Urban Ethiopia.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Obesity, food habits and socio-demographic factors among university students in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Principles for guiding and unlocking transformation of the European Union agrifood system.Nature food · 2026Review
- Children's diet quality: a mixed methods study on the role of domestic food environments in influencing food access during the COVID-19 lockdown in Chile.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Translating Science to Improve Health-a Report from the "Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology" (ADVANTAGE) Project Working Group 5.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Understanding the Decentralised School Food Procurement Model in Ghana Through the Lens of School Caterers: A Photovoice Study.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Context is key for supporting dietary transitions.Nature food · 2026Article
- How Are Adolescents Participating in the Transformation of Healthy Food Environments? A Scoping Review of Empirical Research.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Article
- Article
- Equalising power imbalances or a trail of broken promises? A qualitative study on engaging people with diverse lived experience of marginalisation in food policymaking in Australia.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efforts to address poor-quality diets have stepped up considerably in recent years, but the problem of inadequate, unhealthy, unsustainable and unequal diets persists. Here we argue that to get policies and interventions working more effectively and equitably, a fresh approach is needed-one that considers the full picture of people's realities. People's realities interact to shape the way people respond to and engage with policies and interventions, thereby influencing their impact, particularly, albeit not only, on dietary inequalities. We propose a tool that brings together key realities that shape impact, including the material, economic and psychosocial realities that people face in their households, families, food environments, social interactions and cultures. The purpose of the tool is to help policymakers, intervention practitioners and researchers committed to improving diets achieve greater success by helping them think through the full picture of people's realities when identifying, designing, implementing and evaluating policies and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39420226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.