ArticleScientific reports2024
LSTM-based framework for predicting point defect percentage in semiconductor materials using simulated XRD patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous prediction of early and delayed mortality in burn patients: a comparative machine learning analysis of feature importance in a single-center retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- DiffractGPT: Atomic Structure Determination from X-ray Diffraction Patterns Using a Generative Pretrained Transformer.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we present a machine learning-based approach that leverages Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks combined with a sliding window technique for feature extraction, aimed at accurately predicting point defect percentages in semiconductor materials based on simulated X-ray Diffraction (XRD) data. The model was initially trained on silicon-simulated XRD data with defect percentages ranging from 1 to 5%, enabling it to predict defect percentages from 0 to 10% in silicon and other semiconductor materials, including AlAs, CdS, GaAs, Ge, and ZnS. Through extensive experimentation, we explored different sequence lengths and LSTM units, identifying the optimal configuration as a sequence length of 3501 and 4500 units, which yielded the best results. The model's mean absolute error at 4500 units was 0.021, the lowest among the LSTM configurations tested. The sliding window technique plays a crucial role in capturing temporal dependencies within the XRD data, allowing the model to generalize to other semiconductor materials. Additionally, we observed that increasing defect percentages consistently led to a rise in background intensity. We further examined the relationship between crystal structure and defect precentage predictions, uncovering consistent trends for materials with Diamond Cubic and Zinc Blende structures. This LSTM-based method offers a novel approach to predicting defect percentages using simulated XRD patterns of materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.